Howdoes Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair andjust distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Doesthe principle of considering the special needs of people conflictwith the principle of equal treatment for all?
Brieflydiscuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter.Explain each with examples.
Whatdoes it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of“giving each his due” changed over time?
Which of the following arguments could be used to justify state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens?
(a) Providing free services to the poor and needy can be justified as an act of charity.
(b) Providing all citizens with a basic minimum standard of living is one way of ensuring equality of opportunity.
(c) Some people are naturally lazy and we should be kind to them.
(d) Ensuring basic facilities and a minimum standard of living to all is a recognition of our shared humanity and a human right.
What are generally considered to be the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life? What is the responsibility of governments in trying to ensure this minimum to all?
How does Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Does the principle of considering the special needs of people conflict with the principle of equal treatment for all?
Briefly discuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter. Explain each with examples.
What does it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of “giving each his due” changed over time?
Howdoes Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair andjust distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Doesthe principle of considering the special needs of people conflictwith the principle of equal treatment for all?
Brieflydiscuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter.Explain each with examples.
Whatdoes it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of“giving each his due” changed over time?
Which of the following arguments could be used to justify state action to provide basic minimum conditions of life to all citizens?
(a) Providing free services to the poor and needy can be justified as an act of charity.
(b) Providing all citizens with a basic minimum standard of living is one way of ensuring equality of opportunity.
(c) Some people are naturally lazy and we should be kind to them.
(d) Ensuring basic facilities and a minimum standard of living to all is a recognition of our shared humanity and a human right.
What are generally considered to be the basic minimum requirements of people for living a healthy and productive life? What is the responsibility of governments in trying to ensure this minimum to all?
How does Rawls use the idea of a veil of ignorance to argue that fair and just distribution can be defended on rational grounds?
Does the principle of considering the special needs of people conflict with the principle of equal treatment for all?
Briefly discuss the three principles of justice outlined in the chapter. Explain each with examples.
What does it mean to give each person his/her due? How has the meaning of “giving each his due” changed over time?