The merits of electoral competition are as follows :-
- If political competition is not there, elections will become pointless.
- Electoral competition is more suitable in the long run.
- 5
- Competition will benefit for the citizen.
- Citizen can choose their leader who will create more economic growth.
- This leads to the foundation of well developed society.
Demerits -
- Misuse of govt. money by current govt. leaders.
- Small party who want to give for the society do not do any thing.
- Ulimately more copetitive leaders come in the power who do not give good work for the society.
- 0
Demerits of electoral competition are:-
1. It creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.
2. different political parties and leaders often put allegations against one another.
3. some good people who my wish to severe the country do not enter this field.
Merits of electoral competition are:-
1.regular electoral competition provides incentives to political parties and leaders.
2. political competition helps to force political parties and leaders to serve the people.
1. It creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.
2. different political parties and leaders often put allegations against one another.
3. some good people who my wish to severe the country do not enter this field.
Merits of electoral competition are:-
1.regular electoral competition provides incentives to political parties and leaders.
2. political competition helps to force political parties and leaders to serve the people.
- 39
THERE ARE SEVERAL MERITS AND SEVERAL DEMERITS TOO FOR ELECTORAL COMPETITION BUT HAVING ELECTORAL COMPETITION IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE AS PEOPLE CAN CHOOSE BETWEEN SEVERAL LEADERS WHO THEY WANT TO MAKE LAWS FOR THEM. ALSO, DUE TO ELECTORAL COMPETITION LEADERS HAVE FEAR IN THEIR MIND THAT IF THEY WILL NOT RAISE PUBLIC PROBLEMS NEXT TIME PUBLIC WILL NOT VOTE FOR THEM AND THEY WILL NOT COME TO POWER.
- -1