Literary sources are more useful than archeological sources for writing history.Illustrate the statement.And also support by pictures.

The follwoing points may help you:

a. Literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources because they provide detailed information on the objects and events of the past.
b. People used it to write holy texts, chronicles of rulers, letters and teachings of saints, petitions and judicial records, and for registers of accounts and taxes.
c. It is easy to understand literary sources.
 

  • 37

  Literary sources are more useful than archeological sources for writing 

  • 4

YES ALREADY LITRARY SOURCES ARE MORE IMPORTANT ARCHEOLOGICAL SOURCES

  • 3
What are you looking for?